There are many different terms that Derrida employs Logocentrism emphasises the privileged role that. Derrida’s logocentrism approach challenges the privileging of speech article, these ideas of Derrida are applied by reading the Logos in the. Logocentrism: deconstruction: Deconstruction in philosophy: a manifestation of the “logocentrism” of Western culture—i.e., the general assumption that there is.

Author: Sakazahn Taut
Country: Sao Tome and Principe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 10 July 2012
Pages: 299
PDF File Size: 9.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.15 Mb
ISBN: 624-7-41713-182-2
Downloads: 74301
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fezahn

This was a nice read! The important point is that, for Derrida, a genuine gift requires an anonymity of the giver, such that there is no accrued benefit in giving. Poised in the interstices between philosophy logoceentrism non-philosophy or philosophy and literatureit is not difficult to see why this is the case. Another example of the supplement might be masturbation, as Derrida suggests OGor even the use of birth control precautions.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Reflecting upon tales of Jewish tradition, he highlights the absolute singularity of responsibility to the other.

Every time you try to stabilise the meaning of a thing, try to fix it in its missionary position, the thing derriida, if there is anything at all to it, slips away” cf. If the spoken word requires the written to function properly, then the spoken is itself always at a distance from any supposed clarity of consciousness.

Derrida considers this introjection to be an infidelity to the other. Email required Address never made public.

Derrida’s Critique of Logocentrism

Margins of Philosophytrans. Politics of Friendshiptrans. That term is the messianic and it relies upon a distinction with messianism. Derrida died in Responsibility is enduring this trial of the undecidable decision, where attending to the call of a particular other will inevitably demand an estrangement from the “other others” and their communal needs.

As soon as there is meaning, there is difference. Now, we may return to the previously mentioned question of the ordering of media. In this context, Derrida defines metaphysics as the science of presence, as for him as for Heideggerall metaphysics privileges presence, or that which is.

John Caputo expresses Derrida’s point succinctly when he claims that Derrida’s criticisms of Derfida temporality in Speech derdida Phenomena involve an attempt to convey that: This problematises efforts like Saussure’s, which as well as attempting to keep speech and writing apart, also suggest that writing is an almost unnecessary addition to speech. In various texts, Derrida contests this valorisation of an undivided subjectivity, as well as the primacy that such a position accords to the ‘now’, or to some other kind of temporal immediacy.


His preoccupation with language in this text is typical of much of his early work, and since the publication of these and other major texts including DisseminationGlasThe PostcardSpectres of Marx kogocentrism, The Gift of Deathand Politics of Friendshipdeconstruction has gradually moved from occupying a major role in continental Europe, to also becoming a significant player in the Anglo-American philosophical context.

Routledge,p The importance of speech as central to the development of language is emphasized by logocentrist theory, but the importance of writing is marginalized.

In other words, Derrida is not referring to a future that will one day become present or a particular conception of the saviour who will arrivebut to an openness towards an unknown futurity that is necessarily involved in what we take to be ‘presence’ and hence also renders it ‘impossible’. In this text, Derrida seems to support the sacrificing of a certain notion of ethics and universality for a conception of radical singularity not unlike that evinced by the “hyper-ethical” sacrifice that Abraham makes of his son upon Mt Moriah, according to both the Judaic and Christian religions alike GD Logocentridm University Press, In any binary set of terms, ferrida second can be argued to exist in order to fill in an originary lack in the first.

Rather, Derrida wishes to bring into question the need for, or even the possibility of, having logocentris a hierarchy at all. That is to say, in any present, there must also be the trace of the absent which defines it OG This may sound counter-intuitive, but even a simple ‘thank-you’ for instance, which both acknowledges the presence of lobocentrism gift and also proposes some form of equivalence with that gift, can be seen to annul the gift cf.

What binds me to this one or that one, remains finally unjustifiable” GD You are commenting using your Twitter account. The most prominent opposition with which Derrida’s earlier work is concerned is that between speech and writing.

SPCaputo DN It may be helpful, then, to start at the beginning.

When Derrida was awarded an honorary doctorate at Cambridge inthere were howls of protest from many ‘analytic’ philosophers. Jhonson, Barbara, London, Continuum,p. This is because if the guests take over a house through force, then the host is no longer being hospitable towards them precisely because they are no longer in control of the situation. Key terms from the early work Derrida’s terms change in every text that he writes. University of Chicago Press, GT. University of Chicago Press, D.


Logocentrism – Wikipedia

As Derrida points out, in writing about one particular cause rather than another, in pursuing one profession over another, in spending time with one’s family rather than at work, one inevitably ignores the “other others” GD 69and this is a condition of any and every existence. Significantly, however, according to Derrida, the existential force of this demand for an absolute altruism can never be assuaged, and yet equally clearly it can also never be fulfilled, and this ensures that the condition of the possibility of the gift is dwrrida associated with its impossibility.

As Derrida suggests in Politics of Friendshipthe decision must “surprise the very subjectivity of the subject” PF 68and it is in making this leap away from calculative reasoning that Derrida argues that responsibility consists PF However, what is clear from the antipathy of such thinkers is that deconstruction challenges traditional philosophy in several important ways, and the remainder of this article will highlight why this is so.

In suggesting that a faithful interpretation of him is one that goes beyond drrrida, Derrida installs invention as a vitally important aspect of any deconstructive reading. Derrida explicitly states that “genuine forgiveness must engage two singularities: Supplement The logic of the supplement is also an important aspect of Of Grammatology.

Following this refutation of Husserlian temporality, Derrida remarks logocrntrism “in the last analysis, what is at stake is Borrowing from post-Freudian theories of mourning, he posits although later undermines a difference between introjection, which is love for the other in me, and incorporation, which involves retaining the other as a pocket, or a foreign body within one’s own body.

As Derrida makes explicit, there is a more existential example of this tension, in that the notion of hospitality requires one to be the ‘master’ of the house, country or nation and hence controlling.